Critical to the future of dryland populations is our openness to adaptation. Without adaptation humans must migrate or risk death. By adaptation I mean a willingness to develop and utilise coping mechanisms (new technologies, methods etc) and perhaps most importantly, a preparedness to adopt an alternative lifestyle that may not be complicit with previously apparent traditional heritage or cultures. Mouat and Lancaster (2008) highlight the inextricable linkages between environmental security and human security.
One of the main concerns, however, is that not everybody is able to adapt or migrate. Meze-Hausken (2000) provides a table that explains the factors that may influence migration during times of drought:
The tables give great insight in to strategies that may be employed to help societies out of trouble in drylands. Policies should focus on varied and appropriate crop planting, family size and planning issues, water availability, civil unrest and war, and the number of survival strategies they themselves are aware of. It is highly apparent that there is a distinct lack of focused and directed education in these areas. Is education the most appropriate and sustainable dryland population management solution?
No comments:
Post a Comment